Compare and contrast durkheim and merton anomie

We started it with an essay by Kevin Davisthis has been developed using other student's work. Sometimes alternative passages have been inserted on a coloured background. Introduction This essay is about how Emile Durkheim and Robert Merton 's theories account for crime within society. It will look at how they believe crime relates to society and if a case can be made, to blame society for crime.

Compare and contrast durkheim and merton anomie

Class Essay 1 ANOMIE, 19/11/04, Lee's blog

Sometimes alternative passages have been inserted on a coloured background. It will look at how they believe crime relates to society and if a case can be made, to blame society for crime.

I will argue that Durkheim and Merton construct their theories of society from different premises. I will look at what each means by the concept, and how it fits in with their theories of society. I look at how they can agree on this, but differ on its initial causes. I argue that both believe that crime at some stage is a normal part of society, caused by society, but they differ on it value to society.

Showing that he believes crime in society is normal. I will finish with a final comparison of views.

Compare and contrast durkheim and merton anomie

Alternative introduction from an essay by Michaela Jegede: I argue that Durkheim views society as a unit that is more than a label for a number of people living amongst one another but something that actually has purpose and affects those that live in it.

Durkheim states that social solidarity and the division of labour creates individuals within society and consequently society produces the individual. Durkheim theorizes that anomie is a state of normlessness that may occur in society if solidarity is not properly formed.

According to Durkheim, crime is a social construction that benefits society; by certain behaviours being rejected and labelled as crime, society confirms the acceptable norms and values of wider society. In effect, Durkheim states, crime increases social solidarity.

Merton believes that society shapes the cultural norms and values of people and also their aspirations and the approved methods of achieving such aspirations. Merton considers that there is a link between anomie in society and the difference between the levels of emphasis placed on aspirations and those placed on the means of realizing these aspirations in society; the smaller the difference the less likely anomie will occur.

Merton also believes that crime is caused by society although he believes it is not useful to society; Merton believes that crime is a representation of the poor organization of society. However, whilst Durkheim believes that the core norms and values of members of society remain consensual, it is only in the initial stages of the development of society that he believes their aspirations are similar.

Whilst Durkheim believes that crime is created by society to improve society and maintain its order, Merton believes that society causes individuals to resort to criminal behaviour because of its dysfunctional structure. It is not something you can reach out and touch, like another person, but similar to gravity in that if you go against its norms, or fight against it, it can hurt you.

In The Division of Labour in Society he says there are two ways in which society is bound together: Mechanical Solidarity and Organic Solidarity. Mechanical Solidarity is where the individuals primarily have similar jobs, morals and ways of life and are held together through this similarity by the collective conscience.

Compare and contrast durkheim and merton anomie

As he shows in Suicidethe collective conscience also acts a regulator of individual desires and passions, thereby governing society Durkheim, E.

Society in this form is held together by differences arising from the division of labour; and the strongest sentiments from the collective conscience identified as crime Durkheim, E.This concept of Anomie was introduced by the French sociologist, Emile Durkheim, and he sees this as a breakdown of social regulations.

According to Durkheim, in an anomic situation, there can be a mismatch between the wider social etiquette and the individual or a .

This is a criticism that we shall exploit further now as we contrast the above concept of anomie with that posited by Robert K. Merton. American sociologist Robert K. Merton borrowed Durkheim’s concept of anomie to form his own theory of deviancy. Free coursework on A Comparison Of Marx And Durkheim from, the UK essays company for essay, dissertation and coursework writing.

Not what you're looking for?

In this short analysis, I will attempt to compare and contrast Marx’s and Durkheim’s theories on the structure of modern society. which causes dysfunction. In Durkheim’s anomie, the. Anomie, first developed by Emile Durkheim, is very evident in today's concept of anomie, according to Durkheim, is a state of normlessness, where individuals are succumbed to deregulation in their lives and through out their society brought on by a social K.

Merton, following the ideas of Durkheim, developed his own notion of anomie, called Strain Theory. Compare and Contrast; Anomie Strain and Differential Opportunity Theories Introduction- This paper will cover Anomie Strain, and Differential Opportunity theory.

This will be done by an overview and explanations of the two theories, and by comparing and contrasting the theories based on the explanations Robert Merton, Richard Cloward, and Lloyd. This paper compares and contrasts social theorists' Emile Durkheim and Robert Merton's views on anomie. It explains the origination of the term and how each man took the theory in a different direction, depending upon the time in which he lived.

Mathieu Deflem: Anomie and Strain: Context and Consequences of Merton’s Two Theories